<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daniel Gordis - Dispatches from an Anxious State &#187; Mideast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielgordis.org/tag/mideast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielgordis.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:15:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Strategically Senseless Swap (A New York Times Column)</title>
		<link>http://danielgordis.org/2009/11/25/a-strategically-senseless-swap/</link>
		<comments>http://danielgordis.org/2009/11/25/a-strategically-senseless-swap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Gordis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilad Shalit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mideast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielgordis.org/?p=1458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From a strategic perspective, freeing Gilad Shalit in exchange for hundreds of Palestinians makes no sense. The hundreds of prisoners now in Israeli prison were captured in dangerous operations, many of them at a cost of other Israeli casualties. Despite security considerations, it&#8217;s almost unimaginable that Israel would turn down a deal for Shalit. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1 style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; color: black; font-size: 24px; font-weight: bold; width: 500px;"><a style="color: #990000; text-decoration: underline;" title="Go to Room for Debate Home" href="http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/"><img style="text-decoration: none; border: initial none initial;" src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/blogs_v3/roomfordebate/roomfordebate_print.png" alt="Room for Debate - A New York Times Blog" /></a></h1>
<p><span style="font-family: Georgia, serif; line-height: normal;"> </span></p>
<p style="color: #333333; font-size: medium; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0.7em; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 1.375em; padding: 0px;">From a strategic perspective, freeing Gilad Shalit in exchange for hundreds of Palestinians makes no sense. The hundreds of prisoners now in Israeli prison were captured in dangerous operations, many of them at a cost of other Israeli casualties.</p>
<div style="border-top: 1px solid #666666; padding: 0.5em 0px; float: right; clear: right; margin-left: 12px; margin-right: 0px; width: 190px; margin-top: 5px;">
<div>Despite security considerations, it&#8217;s almost unimaginable that Israel would turn down a deal for Shalit.</p>
<p style="color: #333333; font-size: 12px; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0.7em; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 1.375em; padding: 0px;">
</div>
</div>
<p style="color: #333333; font-size: medium; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0.7em; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 1.375em; padding: 0px;">The outspoken opponents of the trade, who claim that the freed terrorists will return immediately to terrorist activity and may soon kill more Israelis, could well be right about that, too. So, too, are those who fear that paying such a high price for Sgt. Shalit will only induce Hamas and Hezbollah to try to capture more Israelis, both at home and abroad.</p>
<p style="color: #333333; font-size: medium; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0.7em; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 1.375em; padding: 0px;">The Shalit case is also a reminder to all Israelis that that many of the once apparently inviolable red lines of Israeli foreign policy are now much more blurred. Despite Israel&#8217;s stated position that it will not negotiate with terrorists, Israel is clearly negotiating with Hamas.</p>
<div>
<div style="overflow-x: visible; overflow-y: visible;">
<p style="color: #333333; font-size: medium; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0.7em; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 1.375em; padding: 0px;">And with Hamas still publicly committed to Israelï¿½s destruction, Israelis are now being reminded of the limits of our ability to declare who is and is not a player in the Middle East. Making the trade would further blur those lines, opponents insist.</p>
<p style="color: #333333; font-size: medium; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0.7em; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 1.375em; padding: 0px;">Despite all these considerations, however, it is almost unimaginable that if a deal is possible, that Israel will turn it down. Because despite the strategic mistake this might be, Israelis sadly know that the Palestinian-Israeli conflict will end only when Palestinians recognize Israel&#8217;s right to exist, as a Jewish state. And that day, tragically, still seems far off.</p>
<p style="color: #333333; font-size: medium; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0.7em; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 1.375em; padding: 0px;">Therefore, we need to be able to ask our sons and daughters to wage a war in which their own children might well also have to fight. We can ask that of them only if they know that if the unthinkable should happen, we will never rest until they are home.</p>
<p style="color: #333333; font-size: medium; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0.7em; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 1.375em; padding: 0px;">That is the great irony of the Shalit case. On many levels, it makes no strategic sense. But with the conflict likely to persist, and with our sons and daughters asked to make extraordinary sacrifices to keep us safe, they need to know that we are no less devoted to them than they are to us. And on that level, the trade makes all the sense in the world.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danielgordis.org/2009/11/25/a-strategically-senseless-swap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The I&#8217;s Have It</title>
		<link>http://danielgordis.org/2009/10/18/the-is-have-it/</link>
		<comments>http://danielgordis.org/2009/10/18/the-is-have-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Gordis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jewish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mideast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielgordis.org/?p=1360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oct. 15, 2009 Daniel Gordis , THE JERUSALEM POST About one thing, at least, the world seems to be in agreement: Israel is the primary culprit in the Middle East conflict, the cause of relentless Palestinian suffering and the primary obstacle blocking the way to regional peace.   The international chorus of opprobrium is growing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="widows: 2; text-transform: none; text-indent: 0px; border-collapse: separate; font: medium 'Times New Roman'; white-space: normal; orphans: 2; letter-spacing: normal; color: #000000; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><span style="text-align: left; line-height: 19px; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px;"> </span></span></p>
<div style="margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px;"></p>
<div style="margin: 0px;"><a style="color: #cc0000; text-decoration: underline;" href="http://www.jpost.com/"><img src="http://static.jpost.com/images/2002/site/jplogo.gif" border="0" alt="The Jerusalem Post Internet Edition" width="242" height="60" /></a></div>
<p style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 28px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 28px; color: #000000; margin-top: 15px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; font-weight: normal; line-height: 15px;">Oct. 15, 2009</span></p>
<div style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; font-weight: normal; line-height: 15px; margin-top: 15px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-left: 0px;">Daniel Gordis , THE JERUSALEM POST</div>
<p>About one thing, at least, the world seems to be in agreement: Israel is the primary culprit in the Middle East conflict, the cause of relentless Palestinian suffering and the primary obstacle blocking the way to regional peace.  <a href="http://danielgordis.org/sitefiles/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/USJews.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1362" title="USJews" src="http://danielgordis.org/sitefiles/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/USJews.jpg" alt="USJews" /></a></p>
<p>The international chorus of opprobrium is growing by the day. The Hollywood crowd lashes out at the Toronto International Film Festival for its (oh, so sinful) focus on Tel Aviv. The Swedish press breathes new life into the old blood libel.</p>
<p>The Norwegians divest from an Israeli firm because it supplies technology to the separation fence. The Turks refuse to participate in joint air exercises with Israel. The Americans peddle the notion that at its core, the Mideast conflict is really about the settlements.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s relentless, this ganging up, but it&#8217;s also not terribly new. The momentum has been building for years, and though we may not like it, we cannot honestly claim to be surprised.</p>
<p>What <em>is</em> surprising, however, is a recent &#8211; and possibly more ominous &#8211; addition to this chorus. A growing segment of the American Jewish community is abandoning Israel.</p>
<p>Here, too, examples abound: Two American Jewish sociologists, Steven Cohen and Ari Kelman, wrote that among American Jews aged 35 and younger, a full 50% said that the destruction of the State of Israel would not be a personal tragedy for them.</p>
<p>In San Francisco, Jewish communal funds were used to support the SF Jewish Film Festival&#8217;s screening of Rachel, an Israel-bashing &#8220;documentary&#8221; about Rachel Corrie of International Solidarity Movement fame.</p>
<p>Noting that the SFJFF was now effectively in partnership with Jewish Voices for Peace, a well known anti-Israel, pro-boycott organization, many prominent Jews vehemently protested. But the film was shown, anyway.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s Fast For Gaza, that group of rabbis encouraging us to fast in protest against the injustices in Gaza. But if you search their Web site (www.fastforgaza.net) for mention of Sderot or Gilad Schalit, your search will be in vain. Those issues, apparently, are irrelevant to justice for Gaza.</p>
<p>Finally, for now, there&#8217;s Jay Michaelson&#8217;s column in <em>The Forward</em>, entitled &#8220;How I&#8217;m Losing My Love for Israel&#8221; (September 25).</p>
<p>Michaelson, a spokesman for much of the generation that Cohen and Kelman described, wrote that &#8220;I understand why many Israelis feel fed up with the Palestinian problem…. But as an outsider, I no longer want to feel entangled by their decisions and implicated in their consequences. B&#8217;seder: It&#8217;s your choice to make… but count me out.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Count me out&#8221; is pretty strong stuff. But if Michaelson is different from most American Jews of his generation, it&#8217;s mostly because he&#8217;s more articulate. Which leads to the real issue: Why are American Jews abandoning Israel?</p>
<p>That question is the title of a recent column in<em> Ha&#8217;aretz</em> by Prof. Jonathan Sarna, perhaps the greatest living analyst of American Jewish life. The problem, suggests Sarna, is that American Jews have been raised on an idealized image of Israel, and that &#8220;in place of the utopia that we had hoped Israel might become, young Jews today often view Israel through the eyes of contemporary media: They fixate upon its unloveliest warts.&#8221;</p>
<p>But that, says Sarna, is actually good news, for the &#8220;fix&#8221; is clear.</p>
<p>&#8220;By focusing upon all that they nevertheless share in common, and all that they might yet accomplish together in the future, American Jews and Israelis can move past this crisis in their relationship and settle in, as partners, for the long haul ahead.&#8221;</p>
<p>I wish I were convinced, but I&#8217;m not. The loss of American Jewish love for Israel, I fear, is actually much more deeply rooted. The issue isn&#8217;t Israel, or utopia. It&#8217;s America, and the &#8220;I&#8221; at the core of American sensibilities.</p>
<p>Another profound observer of American Jewish life, Rabbi Morris Allen of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, recently wrote with sadness that for contemporary American Jews, life-cycle rituals have become infinitely more significant than the holiday cycle.</p>
<p>Both Sarna and Allen are actually pointing to a shared challenge.Most American Jews are first and foremost Americans. And today&#8217;s America is about the celebration of individuality and a future unfettered by ethnic loyalties.</p>
<p>In America, the narratives of immigrant groups are eroded, year by year, generation after generation. In America, we are oriented to the future, not to the past, and if we cling to some larger grouping, it is to a human collective whole rather than to some &#8220;narrow&#8221; ethnic clan.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the cause for what Rabbi Allen has observed. Because Jewish holidays celebrate peoplehood, a collective embrace of a shared mythical past, they are less compelling for typical American Jews than are life-cycle ceremonies, which focus on the future, my family &#8211; and me.</p>
<p>Similarly, the recreation of the State of Israel is truly powerful only against a backdrop of centuries of Jewish experience, and is spine-tingling only if my sense of self is inseparable from my belonging to a nation with a past and a people with a purpose.</p>
<p>In today&#8217;s individualistic America, the drama of the rebirth of the Jewish people creates no goose bumps and evokes no sense of duty or obligation. Add the issue of Palestinian suffering, and Israel seems worse than irrelevant &#8211; it&#8217;s actually a source of shame.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re not terribly alarmed, but we should be. These young American Jews, after all, will soon control the coffers of the federations, and will sit on the boards of synagogues. Their generation will either strengthen or abandon AIPAC, the Joint Distribution Committee (JDC), and the American Jewish Committee (AJC). They will be the ones allocating funding to schools, setting curricula and communal priorities.</p>
<p>&#8220;Who is wise?&#8221; asks the Talmud. &#8220;He who can see what is about to happen.&#8221; Deep down, we know what&#8217;s about to happen. A gaping chasm threatens the American-Israeli relationship, and we&#8217;re basically doing nothing. Try to list the serious Jewish educational enterprises addressing this challenge, asking how American Jewish education can counter America&#8217;s unfettered individualism, or what Israel could do to help.</p>
<p>Can you name even one? Neither can I.</p>
<p></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danielgordis.org/2009/10/18/the-is-have-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Obama Said, What the Mideast Heard</title>
		<link>http://danielgordis.org/2009/06/05/what-obama-said-what-the-mideast-heard/</link>
		<comments>http://danielgordis.org/2009/06/05/what-obama-said-what-the-mideast-heard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 05:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Gordis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mideast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netanyahu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielgordis.org/?p=1137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While President Obama&#8217;s speech was addressed to the Arab world, it had been nervously anticipated in Israel, as well. In its aftermath, some Israelis are quibbling with word choices or wondering whether he is naïve in believing that Hamas might renounce terror or that Iranians can be entrusted with civilian nuclear capacity. Others are assailing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://danielgordis.org/sitefiles/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/nytlogo153x23.gif"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1077" title="nytlogo153x23" src="http://danielgordis.org/sitefiles/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/nytlogo153x23.gif" alt="nytlogo153x23" /></a>While President Obama&#8217;s speech was addressed to the Arab world, it had been nervously anticipated in Israel, as well. In its aftermath, some Israelis are quibbling with word choices or wondering whether he is naïve in believing that Hamas might renounce terror or that Iranians can be entrusted with civilian nuclear capacity. Others are assailing his comments about settlements.</p>
<p><a href="http://danielgordis.org/sitefiles/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/obamacairo.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1138" title="obamacairo" src="http://danielgordis.org/sitefiles/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/obamacairo.jpg" alt="obamacairo" /></a>But the real news is that contrary to what many expected, or feared, President Obama assumed positions virtually identical to those of Israel&#8217;s political center &#8212; namely, that the Palestinians must renounce violence and recognize Israel&#8217;s right to exist, while Israel must cease settlement building and permit a Palestinian state to arise. Now, Benjamin Netanyahu&#8217;s problem is that it&#8217;s difficult to distinguish between President Obama and Tzipi Livni. And in Israel&#8217;s recent elections, Livni and her Kadima party won more votes than anyone else.</p>
<p>But the major &#8220;problem&#8221; that the speech poses for Israel&#8217;s leaders is that Israelis are finally going to have to make painful decisions about our future. No longer will Israel&#8217;s fractious politics provide a curtain behind which to hide. Will we abide a Palestinian state, or are we committed to the present stalemate as a matter of principle? Are we committed to keeping the West Bank (for reasons of security, history or theology), or are we open to withdrawing if a genuine peace accord is possible? If all Jews will have to depart the West Bank, what about Arabs in Israel? For years, we&#8217;ve fudged on these painful questions; with President Obama, that may no longer be possible.</p>
<p>Once Israelis grow accustomed to the new tenor emanating from Washington, we may see today&#8217;s speech in a different light. Barack Obama may or may not bring peace to the Middle East, but he may well force clarity, and perhaps disciplined policy, on an Israeli society that has long desperately needed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danielgordis.org/2009/06/05/what-obama-said-what-the-mideast-heard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

