<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For the Sake of Clarity &#8211; A Thought Experiment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielgordis.org/2009/05/17/for-the-sake-of-clarity-a-thought-experiment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielgordis.org/2009/05/17/for-the-sake-of-clarity-a-thought-experiment/</link>
	<description>Daniel Gordis, whom  Alan Dershowitz has called “one of Israel’s most insightful observers,” writes and lectures throughout the world on Israeli society and the challenges facing the Jewish state.  He blogs at www.danielgordis.org.”  </description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:36:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://danielgordis.org/2009/05/17/for-the-sake-of-clarity-a-thought-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielgordis.org/?p=1095#comment-287</guid>
		<description>If the motive for removing settlements and forfeiting sovereignty in the west bank and east Jerusalem were to achieve a complete peace then indeed i would not get us instantly to this goal.

But doing these things is surely a matter of self-interest: ie to save israeli democracy and allow our country to hold onto its values. 

The difficulty of achieving peace shouldnt stop us from taking steps to avoid letting the west bank slip into a state of apartheid (something which there is a real danger of) The continuation of the status quo will only result in the majority population (palestinians) becoming subjugated to the minority population (settlers).
We cant just wait for the palestinians to act for this will be too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the motive for removing settlements and forfeiting sovereignty in the west bank and east Jerusalem were to achieve a complete peace then indeed i would not get us instantly to this goal.</p>
<p>But doing these things is surely a matter of self-interest: ie to save israeli democracy and allow our country to hold onto its values. </p>
<p>The difficulty of achieving peace shouldnt stop us from taking steps to avoid letting the west bank slip into a state of apartheid (something which there is a real danger of) The continuation of the status quo will only result in the majority population (palestinians) becoming subjugated to the minority population (settlers).<br />
We cant just wait for the palestinians to act for this will be too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: galia</title>
		<link>http://danielgordis.org/2009/05/17/for-the-sake-of-clarity-a-thought-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>galia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 01:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielgordis.org/?p=1095#comment-216</guid>
		<description>On Jews &quot;returning to holy land&quot;, following symbolism of the scriptures, to live in Holly land is a metaphor for living in a state of inner peace with oneself and outer peace with your neighbors. Were the returning Jews attempting to achieve that and not to acquire all the land for themselves (the Zionist agenda) we would have seen different situation. Jews lived peacefully next to Muslims in Palestinian land for centuries. 

It&#039;s a basic human right that one can travel and stay in any land, &quot;holly land&quot;, &quot;european land&quot; wherever one wishes to go.
As for staying and taking over someone&#039;s land by means of war or illegally, that&#039;s a different matter. An illegal immigrant is to be deported. That&#039;s the law of any land, Israelis are no exceptions. So let&#039;s not confuse basic human rights with legal rights. There is no &quot;double standard&quot;. 

Honestly, i don&#039;t trust Israeli courts. There is an obvious bias and discrimination against Palestinians and lack of justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Jews &#8220;returning to holy land&#8221;, following symbolism of the scriptures, to live in Holly land is a metaphor for living in a state of inner peace with oneself and outer peace with your neighbors. Were the returning Jews attempting to achieve that and not to acquire all the land for themselves (the Zionist agenda) we would have seen different situation. Jews lived peacefully next to Muslims in Palestinian land for centuries. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a basic human right that one can travel and stay in any land, &#8220;holly land&#8221;, &#8220;european land&#8221; wherever one wishes to go.<br />
As for staying and taking over someone&#8217;s land by means of war or illegally, that&#8217;s a different matter. An illegal immigrant is to be deported. That&#8217;s the law of any land, Israelis are no exceptions. So let&#8217;s not confuse basic human rights with legal rights. There is no &#8220;double standard&#8221;. </p>
<p>Honestly, i don&#8217;t trust Israeli courts. There is an obvious bias and discrimination against Palestinians and lack of justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roddy Frankel</title>
		<link>http://danielgordis.org/2009/05/17/for-the-sake-of-clarity-a-thought-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Roddy Frankel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 02:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielgordis.org/?p=1095#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Galia, you are right to say that religion is personal, that scriptures are full of symbolism, parables and allegories. But, getting back to Jewish settlements, you do not have to believe in scriptures to defend the rights of Jews to return to their holy land. It is a basic human right. No one would consider telling Arabs they have no right living on &quot;European Land.&quot; Why the double standard? If you are concerned about land deeds and building permits, let the Israeli courts handle those issues. Three hundred thousand Jews live in the West Bank. Anyone who promotes their deportation is no better than the Russian Cossacks during the Jewish pogroms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Galia, you are right to say that religion is personal, that scriptures are full of symbolism, parables and allegories. But, getting back to Jewish settlements, you do not have to believe in scriptures to defend the rights of Jews to return to their holy land. It is a basic human right. No one would consider telling Arabs they have no right living on &#8220;European Land.&#8221; Why the double standard? If you are concerned about land deeds and building permits, let the Israeli courts handle those issues. Three hundred thousand Jews live in the West Bank. Anyone who promotes their deportation is no better than the Russian Cossacks during the Jewish pogroms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: galia</title>
		<link>http://danielgordis.org/2009/05/17/for-the-sake-of-clarity-a-thought-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>galia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 19:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielgordis.org/?p=1095#comment-179</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Medad, </p>
<p>My beliefs as Christian are that Jesus teaches peace, love and goodness. It is my interpretation and my understanding of  Jesus, that he  never meant for anyone to actually pick up a sword and murder his enemies for any cause. That is simply not Jesus that I believe in. His words are at most symbolic for a spiritual warfare we are to fight on a personal level whatever it is on our way to inner peace.   </p>
<p>Jesus says, thy shall not murder.  Under no conditions, no exceptions. </p>
<p>But that’s my take on it. That’s my religion. </p>
<p>I agree with you that religious writings should not ever be quoted during a political argument and should never be part of politics, it’s messy enough without it.  But it’s not what this blog post is. Rabbi suggested it for a sake of an exercise, an experiment that this post was about.  And  I believe that it’s a powerful argument for peace.  </p>
<p>Do you want peace? Mr. Gordis pessimistic and hopeless take on this issue offers no solution. Do you have one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yisrael Medad</title>
		<link>http://danielgordis.org/2009/05/17/for-the-sake-of-clarity-a-thought-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Yisrael Medad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 06:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielgordis.org/?p=1095#comment-177</guid>
		<description>Ah, Galia, you misunderstand.

First, would you be more comfortable, being a Christian, if I quoted Jesus&#039; words from the New Testament?

Matthew 10:34 - &quot;I come not to bring peace, but to bring a sword&quot; or Luke 22:36 - &quot;But now, whoever has a money belt is to take it along, likewise also a bag, and whoever has no sword is to sell his coat and buy one.&quot; 

But the real point was that I was pointing out to the Rabbi that one cannot quote Scripture one-sidedly and expect to discourse on modern political events based on that biased perspective.  The Bible, either as a religious tract or a moral guidebook, should be taken as a whole.  And, if in the Bible some Prophets desire a strong Israel, to quote a defeatists sentence and ignore others is not being a good Rabbi nor an excellent political activist, if one plays a guitar or not.

It&#039;s not a fair or ethical way of discussing the right sof Jews in their land.  I am not asserting a final conclusion but simply pointing out a bit of selective quotating which I personally have bno sympathy for in an argument.

Either the Rabbi was being unfair in hiding the verse in Yoel or he didn&#039;t know of the other verse.  Which is worse, you decide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, Galia, you misunderstand.</p>
<p>First, would you be more comfortable, being a Christian, if I quoted Jesus&#8217; words from the New Testament?</p>
<p>Matthew 10:34 &#8211; &#8220;I come not to bring peace, but to bring a sword&#8221; or Luke 22:36 &#8211; &#8220;But now, whoever has a money belt is to take it along, likewise also a bag, and whoever has no sword is to sell his coat and buy one.&#8221; </p>
<p>But the real point was that I was pointing out to the Rabbi that one cannot quote Scripture one-sidedly and expect to discourse on modern political events based on that biased perspective.  The Bible, either as a religious tract or a moral guidebook, should be taken as a whole.  And, if in the Bible some Prophets desire a strong Israel, to quote a defeatists sentence and ignore others is not being a good Rabbi nor an excellent political activist, if one plays a guitar or not.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a fair or ethical way of discussing the right sof Jews in their land.  I am not asserting a final conclusion but simply pointing out a bit of selective quotating which I personally have bno sympathy for in an argument.</p>
<p>Either the Rabbi was being unfair in hiding the verse in Yoel or he didn&#8217;t know of the other verse.  Which is worse, you decide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: galia</title>
		<link>http://danielgordis.org/2009/05/17/for-the-sake-of-clarity-a-thought-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>galia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 22:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielgordis.org/?p=1095#comment-175</guid>
		<description>Mr. Medad
You are openly justifying violence citing Jewish Bible. How exactly are you different from radical Islamists that you think of as your enemies? 

Is that what they teach you in your rabbinical seminary?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Medad<br />
You are openly justifying violence citing Jewish Bible. How exactly are you different from radical Islamists that you think of as your enemies? </p>
<p>Is that what they teach you in your rabbinical seminary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yisrael Medad</title>
		<link>http://danielgordis.org/2009/05/17/for-the-sake-of-clarity-a-thought-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Yisrael Medad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 20:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielgordis.org/?p=1095#comment-174</guid>
		<description>I checked:

Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, 1989 and University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 1978.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I checked:</p>
<p>Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, 1989 and University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 1978.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yisrael Medad</title>
		<link>http://danielgordis.org/2009/05/17/for-the-sake-of-clarity-a-thought-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Yisrael Medad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 20:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielgordis.org/?p=1095#comment-173</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just love Rabbis who quote the Bible.  Rabbi Art writes:  &#8216;Try another thought experiment: “nation shall not lift up sword against nation, and study war no more.”&#8217;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s try Yoel,4,10 &#8211; &#8220;Beat your plowshares into swords, and your pruning-hooks into spears; let the weak say: &#8216;I am strong.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>Oops.  That&#8217;s a bit neo-con.  God works in mysterious ways.</p>
<p>And as for this: &#8220;What about the settlers’ who continue to attack innocent Palestinian farmers? Or the ongoing home demolitions? Check out the work of Rabbis for Human Rights!!!&#8221;  </p>
<p>Well, what about them?  It would seem that for you, Rabbi, all the wicked evil deeds of Arab (note: not &#8220;the&#8221; Arabs like in &#8220;the&#8221; Settlers) pogromists (1920, 1929, 1936-39), the fedayeen, the Fatah, the Hamas, the Islamic Jihad do not spoil, cancel or injure any of the &#8220;rights&#8221; those RHR clergymen promote for them but a few Jewish revenants all who are either denounced by their fellows or arrested by the authorities somehow convince you we Jews do not belong in Shiloh, Hebron or Elon Moreh?  Or that their violence is worse that Arab violence?  Arabs can blow up restaurants, buses, etc. but Jewish rights are canceled due to the demolition of houses with court approval?</p>
<p>What rabbinical seminary did you graduate?  What philosophy course did you take?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabbi Art Donsky</title>
		<link>http://danielgordis.org/2009/05/17/for-the-sake-of-clarity-a-thought-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabbi Art Donsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielgordis.org/?p=1095#comment-172</guid>
		<description>How sad, banal and trite.

Danny - you could do better!

What about the settlers&#039; who continue to attack innocent Palestinian farmers? Or the ongoing home demolitions? Check out the work of Rabbis for Human Rights!!! 

Both peoples must take responsibility and stop blaming the other and stop thinking backward.

President Obama has it correct and its time for neo-cons, and the right to get it!  

Try another thought experiment:  &quot;nation shall not lift up sword against nation, and study war no more.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How sad, banal and trite.</p>
<p>Danny &#8211; you could do better!</p>
<p>What about the settlers&#8217; who continue to attack innocent Palestinian farmers? Or the ongoing home demolitions? Check out the work of Rabbis for Human Rights!!! </p>
<p>Both peoples must take responsibility and stop blaming the other and stop thinking backward.</p>
<p>President Obama has it correct and its time for neo-cons, and the right to get it!  </p>
<p>Try another thought experiment:  &#8220;nation shall not lift up sword against nation, and study war no more.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elcid</title>
		<link>http://danielgordis.org/2009/05/17/for-the-sake-of-clarity-a-thought-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>elcid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 06:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielgordis.org/?p=1095#comment-170</guid>
		<description>I believe that all new American administrations have started their term with the same attitude towards this seemingly insurmountable problem. They find out soon enough that the Palestinians don&#039;t want peace (their raison d&#039;etre would disappear)and then they make all the right political noises as if they are working on a peace deal, knowing full well that it will never come to pass. We need to understand that we live in a surreal political world where pragmatism and common sense have no place. Israel must ignore the one eyed criticism and carry on regardless and wait for the American administration to see the light, as they did in the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that all new American administrations have started their term with the same attitude towards this seemingly insurmountable problem. They find out soon enough that the Palestinians don&#8217;t want peace (their raison d&#8217;etre would disappear)and then they make all the right political noises as if they are working on a peace deal, knowing full well that it will never come to pass. We need to understand that we live in a surreal political world where pragmatism and common sense have no place. Israel must ignore the one eyed criticism and carry on regardless and wait for the American administration to see the light, as they did in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

